I wish this were a debate entry. Which all contribute ideas.
The initial question would be, you agree with the implementation of the area at some point in the game? What categories of training?
The first question seems stupid, but in Asturias there are clubs that prohibit this type of defense on all their computers, they still require significant competitive objectives.
My opinion is clear about the area itself and always, in addition to a good individual defense base.
competitive
A trap is a very important and helps to plug holes that your defense may have, as people very large and slow against a opposing team playing with 5 open they are great penetrators, for example.
level of training is one of the best ways to teach the difference between the weak side and strong side, as well as communication and teamwork as one of the major mistakes of teaching individual defense is to build a defensive egotism in children who believe their only purpose is to defend him.
obviously I am opposed to areas "Sunflower" (moving under the ball and looking as if the sun) and when bringing this kind of defense I demand the same intensity as in individual, in fact I have never raised an area that had not one based on individual concepts, such as:
The ball always defended individually, both in intensity and handwork, low post players or high post have the same standards that individual defensive ....
Thereafter, 2-3, 3-2, combinations ... That all depends on my players and my philosophy.
For example this year I have individual base defense, when not working, is to add 3 more zone defenses that maintain and even increase current level of team defense.
What is your opinion?
0 comments:
Post a Comment